Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT): A Study of Validity and Reliability

Mehmet Emrah KARADERE; Kasım Fatih YAVUZ; İbrahim Enis KAYRAN; Yasir ŞAFAK; Bengü YÜCENS; Erkan KURU; M. Hakan TÜRKÇAPAR

2022, Vol: 11, Issue: 1

11/1Current Issue Online First Archive Aims and Scope Abstracting & Indexing Most Accessed Articles Most Downloaded Articles Most Cited Articles

Required files to be uploaded

Authorship Declaration Form
Ethical Standarts Form

Original Research

JCBPR. 0; 0(0):

Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT): A Study of Validity and Reliability

Mehmet Emrah KARADERE, Kasım Fatih YAVUZ, İbrahim Enis KAYRAN, Yasir ŞAFAK, Bengü YÜCENS, Erkan KURU, M. Hakan TÜRKÇAPAR.

Abstract
Objective: The aim of our study is to research reliability and validity and to evaluate the usability of Turkish version of Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT) in Turkish healty population.
Method: 51 healty volunteers who work in Ankara Dıskapi Yildirim Beyazit Research and Training Hospital participated in this study. Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT) was translated into Turkish by three clinical good knowledge of English. Participants were given a sociodemographic data form, and RIAT were performed by clinicians. To test the reliability of the Turkish version of RIAT, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated and the halving method was used for the test.
Results: The internal consistency of the Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT) items, Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient measurements of 0.73 was found to be statistically significant. Spearman-Brown coefficient that determines the reliability of the whole test r=0.74 was found. Kurtosis values of all the items was below 1.5 and the percentages in the second evaluation were mainly lower. At the same time, both change in belief between self produced RIAT options and given RIAT options (p=0.02, z=-2296) as well as changes in beliefs between related and unrelated items for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) difference (p=0.03, z=-2.199) were significant.
Conclusion: The preliminary data obtained from the study of reliability and validity of the scale shows that Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test supports reliability and validity in Turkish population.

Key words: Keywords: lojic, thinking, reasoning, validity, reliability

	ARTICLE TOOLS
	Abstract
	How to cite this article
	Citation Tools
	Related Records
	Articles by Mehmet Emrah KARADERE Articles by Kasım Fatih YAVUZ Articles by İbrahim Enis KAYRAN Articles by Yasir ŞAFAK Articles by Bengü YÜCENS Articles by Erkan KURU Articles by M. Hakan TÜRKÇAPAR
	on Google
	on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article

Pubmed Style

KARADERE ME, YAVUZ KF, KAYRAN �E, ŞAFAK Y, YUCENS B, KURU E, TURKCAPAR MH. Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT): A Study of Validity and Reliability. JCBPR. 0; 0(0): -.

Web Style

KARADERE ME, YAVUZ KF, KAYRAN �E, ŞAFAK Y, YUCENS B, KURU E, TURKCAPAR MH. Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT): A Study of Validity and Reliability. https://www.jcbpr.org/?mno=43201 [Access: April 05, 2022].

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

KARADERE ME, YAVUZ KF, KAYRAN �E, ŞAFAK Y, YUCENS B, KURU E, TURKCAPAR MH. Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT): A Study of Validity and Reliability. JCBPR. 0; 0(0): -.

Vancouver/ICMJE Style

KARADERE ME, YAVUZ KF, KAYRAN �E, ŞAFAK Y, YUCENS B, KURU E, TURKCAPAR MH. Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT): A Study of Validity and Reliability. JCBPR. (0), [cited April 05, 2022]; 0(0): -.

Harvard Style

KARADERE, M. E., YAVUZ, . K. F., KAYRAN, . �. E., ŞAFAK, . Y., YUCENS, . B., KURU, . E. & TURKCAPAR, . M. H. (0) Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT): A Study of Validity and Reliability. JCBPR, 0 (0), -.

Turabian Style

KARADERE, Mehmet Emrah, Kasım Fatih YAVUZ, İbrahim Enis KAYRAN, Yasir ŞAFAK, Bengu YUCENS, Erkan KURU, and M. Hakan TURKCAPAR. 0. Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT): A Study of Validity and Reliability. Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 0 (0), -.

Chicago Style

KARADERE, Mehmet Emrah, Kasım Fatih YAVUZ, İbrahim Enis KAYRAN, Yasir ŞAFAK, Bengu YUCENS, Erkan KURU, and M. Hakan TURKCAPAR. "Reasoning with Inductive Argument Test (RIAT): A Study of Validity and Reliability." Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research 0 (0), -.

MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

APA (American Psychological Association) Style

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access. The articles in Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research are open access articles licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

Copyright � 2022 Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research All Rights Reserved. Subject to change without notice from or liability to Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research. For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome	Contact Information İletişim / Contact JCBPR Executive Editor: Ali Ercan Altınöz; ercanaltinoz[@]gmail.com Association for Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies Secretary: Özge Yılmaz; Address: İran Caddesi, Karum İş Merkezi, Numara 463 (6. kat) A Asansörü yanı, Çankaya, Ankara Cell: +90-544-224 26 01 bdpdernek[@]yandex.com

Contact Information

How to cite this article