E-ISSN 2636-8765 | ISSN 2146-9490
 

Review Article 


Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain

Başak İnce.

Abstract
Despite the shown effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies (CBT) for chronic pain, it is not clear which CBT approach is more effective and which components or combinations of CBT account for a better treatment outcome. In this regard, this study aimed to systematically review the studies investigating the effectiveness of all forms of CBT for the treatment of individuals with chronic pain. For this purpose, randomised controlled clinical trials on adults with chronic pain published between the years of 2006 and 2016 have been searched in the Google Scholar, Web of Science and EBSCO databases by using the keywords “chronic pain”, “pain disorders”, “cognitive behavioural therapy” or “treatment”. Following database search, 24 trials were identified based on the eligibility criteria. Primary outcomes were demonstrated to be pain intensity, disability, self-efficacy, and pain control, whereas secondary outcomes were related to emotional difficulties. In terms of comparative effectiveness, findings revealed that all forms of CBT are significantly more effective than physical treatments, particularly for emotional problems. However, no statistically significant differences were found for the comparison of traditional CBT and mindfulness and acceptance-based treatments. Findings further underlined that some forms of CBT appeared to produce greater improvements in some of the outcome measures. Findings of this review emphasise that what is in fact responsible for the positive outcome while delivering CBT for chronic pain is still not clear. Thus, future research should focus on identifying specific components and underlying mechanisms of CBT in order to maximize treatment outcome.

Key words: chronic pain, cognitive behavioural therapies, mindfulness, acceptance


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Başak İnce
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Ince B, . Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain. doi:10.5455/JCBPR.64324


Web Style

Ince B, . Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain. http://www.jcbpr.org/?mno=64324 [Access: August 31, 2020]. doi:10.5455/JCBPR.64324


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Ince B, . Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain. doi:10.5455/JCBPR.64324



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Ince B, . Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain. doi:10.5455/JCBPR.64324



Harvard Style

Ince, B. & (2020) Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain. doi:10.5455/JCBPR.64324



Turabian Style

Ince, Basak, and . 2020. Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain. doi:10.5455/JCBPR.64324



Chicago Style

Ince, Basak, and . "Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain." doi:10.5455/JCBPR.64324



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Ince, Basak, and . "Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain." doi:10.5455/JCBPR.64324



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Ince, B. & (2020) Systematic Review of the Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies for Chronic Pain. doi:10.5455/JCBPR.64324