E-ISSN 2636-8765 | ISSN 2146-9490
 

Original Research 
JCBPR. 2013; 2(3): 167-172


Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts

Ömer ŞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GÜÇLÜ, Güliz ŞENORMANCI.

Abstract
Objective: Although cognitive behavioral model of Internet addiction has been well described, studies on metacognitions and ruminative response styles related with Internet addiction are very limited. The aim of the present study was to compare metacognitions and ruminative response style in Internet addicts with a healthy control group.
Method: The study included 30 males who presented to our Internet Addiction Outpatient clinic, and diagnosed with Internet addiction, and a control group of 30 healthy males with similar sociodemographic characteristics. A sociodemographic data form, Internet Addiction Test (IAT), Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Ruminative Response Scale-short version (RRS-SV), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were used for data collection.
Results: The MCQ-30 total, MCQ-30 uncontrollability and danger score, MCQ-30 need to control thoughts score and RRS-SV scores statistically significantly higher in study group compared the control group. After correcting for BDI by ANCOVA, the difference between MCQ-30 total score and RRS-SV disappeared.
Conclusion: Internet addicts show ruminative responses instead of having an effective problem-solving attitude and defining problems; and this self-focused rumination leads an individual to recall more reinforced memories about the Internet so that the problem of Internet addiction becomes deeper. As a result of this study, although Internet addiction is accompanied by depression primarily or secondarily, manifestation of Internet addiction is exacerbated by depression through ruminative responses and metacognitions.

Key words: Internet, addiction, cognition, metacognition, ruminative response styles


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Ömer ŞENORMANCI
Articles by Ramazan KONKAN
Articles by Oya GÜÇLÜ
Articles by Güliz ŞENORMANCI
on Google
on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Omer ŞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GUCLU, Guliz ŞENORMANCI. Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts. JCBPR. 2013; 2(3): 167-172.


Web Style

Omer ŞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GUCLU, Guliz ŞENORMANCI. Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts. https://www.jcbpr.org/?mno=150658 [Access: August 01, 2022].


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Omer ŞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GUCLU, Guliz ŞENORMANCI. Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts. JCBPR. 2013; 2(3): 167-172.



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Omer ŞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GUCLU, Guliz ŞENORMANCI. Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts. JCBPR. (2013), [cited August 01, 2022]; 2(3): 167-172.



Harvard Style

Omer ŞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GUCLU, Guliz ŞENORMANCI (2013) Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts. JCBPR, 2 (3), 167-172.



Turabian Style

Omer ŞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GUCLU, Guliz ŞENORMANCI. 2013. Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts. Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 2 (3), 167-172.



Chicago Style

Omer ŞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GUCLU, Guliz ŞENORMANCI. "Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts." Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research 2 (2013), 167-172.



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Omer ŞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GUCLU, Guliz ŞENORMANCI. "Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts." Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research 2.3 (2013), 167-172. Print.



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Omer ŞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GUCLU, Guliz ŞENORMANCI (2013) Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts. Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 2 (3), 167-172.